That excerpt is a portion of the first page. The letter itself ran to 28 pages and has Exhibits A through Q. I have sent subsequent correspondence to the same two committees. For those, I have used RE: CONGRESSIONAL RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF TREASON, and have used Subject lines as appropriate; for example:
Subject: SEPTEMBER 11, 1986, AND SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, dated April 20, 2018, with Exhibits A through C.
Subject: FOIPA REQUEST NO. 1362193-002, dated April 21, 2018, with Exhibits A through C.
Subject: OUT OF ONE, MANY, dated April 22, 2018, with Exhibits A through C.
Subject: SWALLOWED UP IN LOVE, dated April 23, 2018, with Exhibits A through E.
Subject: NATURE OF CRIME, dated April 24, 2018, with Exhibits A and B, the audio file of a conversation between my son Josiah Robert Fornof and myself. I sent that at or about 12:30 AM EDT, about eight and a half hours before a court hearing that morning, a detail that I mention because just outside of Court, my lawyer told me the Court had given an order for me to be evaluated for competence to proceed. I told him that is just so much more of them dancing around the fact that everything I do in this matter is under duress of Treason. Then:
1) He said it is specifically because of my claim that I am a witness to Treason that he filed a motion for the appointment of a doctor to evaluate my competence to proceed. He did that without consulting me, and the Court granted that motion. I was not consulted about nor notified about any of that until Court that day;
2) He asked me whether I even know what Treason is. It seems to me that he should have asked me that before assuming I need a competency evaluation, which is always the wrongdoers’ default position, as I have seen at least three times previously, in three different cases. When I told him that Treason consists in levying war (as the Constitution states) he said that is not what it is, that it is like when someone sells firearms to an enemy of this country who then uses those firearms against the United States. Had he been prompted to say that to me? When I tried to give a more complete answer, he cut me off and said he wasn’t going to try to parse my case there in the hallway. Obviously, for my own self defense, I will have to address all of this.
See for yourself whether I have a grasp on what Treason is and whether I had already established that in the Congressional record before Court that day.
A few minutes before sending all of that to Congress via email, I emailed it all to the judge with a brief cover email:
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Kimberly Blevins <[redacted]>
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:23 AM
Subject: NATURE OF CRIME
To: Kim Campbell <[redacted]>
Dear Judge Campbell:
Treason is the highest crime, the most serious offense against the United States. For that reason, it is utterly appropriate that I communicate with you ex parte about Case No. [redacted] which is rife with acts of treason and treasonable acts and always has been, as I have informed the Court repeatedly from the very first hearing on the related civil matters, on October 19, 2012. I ordered the recording of that hearing, but due to my disability have not been able to bear listening to it. I know what I said and how the Court responded.
The attached pertains to you.
(Notice) under duress of treason (imputed by law),
Kimberly Ann Blevins
18060 Owen Drive
Hudson, Florida 34667
The recording above cuts off abruptly for the simple reason that the minutes for the call ran out. Josiah is only allotted 15 minutes per call.
In that conversation, I talked about a letter I had written to the Court. During a hearing on April 24, 2018, the judge acknowledged having received that letter, and she gave details about her receipt of same. Moreover, she asked for confirmation from the Defense and from the State about whether they had received that letter. That was beautiful, because now it is not just a case of my having a return receipt, but now it is read into the Court record that all three entities/individuals have received my correspondence to the Court which commences:
Dear Judge Campbell:
The State’s above-referenced case against me is a product of the State’s treason and misprision of treason, commencing and continuing contiguously from at least as far back as September 11, 1986.
That letter is listed in the Court record. In Court, the Judge also made sure to reference it as four pages. The letter is only one page. The other three pages are enclosures, important ones. Since she made it a part of the Court record that the letter is four pages, if any one of those pages comes up missing, that will be a problem.
The cover letter dated April 18, 2018, to Congress that I referred to in that conversation is included herein.
2018-04-18 — KAB to Committee Chairs
While writing this, I note that another parcel is en route to my address from Jacksonville, Florida, a light parcel. Perhaps that is the August 17, 2010, audio recording and transcript I have been waiting on for so long (FOIPA Request No. 1362193-002). Or perhaps something that someone here ordered online that has nothing to do with this case. We will see.
2018-04-21 — KAB to Two Committees
I had been up all night and was about to go to bed for a couple of hours of sleep, when the Lord prompted me to get back up (6:12 PM EDT, 5:12 PM Ark Time) and write about the letter I am preparing to send to Congress, possibly yet today.
This one has the provisional subject line of DÉTENTE which begins:
The purpose of this letter is to call for détente between the warring factions within the United States; namely: between the Lawful and the Lawless. An easing of hostility is both wise and prudent especially since many who are among the lawless do not recognize that is the side that they are serving and in doing so, they are committing Treason. The United States must accept responsibility for allowing circumstances to reach such a point and for rectifying same peacefully.
That is a draft, so could change. What I am to draw your attention to is the following:
In writing this letter to you, I am calling for détente for however long it takes for everyone to come to the place of making this country what God wants it to be, what it claims to be; namely: One Nation Under God. In the interest of setting that process in motion, I assert the full weight of the Law, which is on my side. I am an American Citizen. I am also a Public Servant. I am a Witness to Treason committed by the United States, the State of Florida, et al, and I am disabled as a direct result of said Treason.
One of the worst things that Congress could do in response to my family’s case would be to create new laws. Quite the contrary. I posit that the laws at every level should be scrutinized for whether they conform to the United States Constitution as contemplated by our forebears. However, that is not the main theme of this letter or any of my letters. Causing the War to cease, lawfully, and peacefully, is the theme.
The alternative is that the People will remain in the position that the United States has put them in; namely, of having reverted to their natural right of self defense which the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution was written to recognize and the Government was established to protect. The Government did not give that or any other right to the People, God did. The Government cannot infringe on the People’s rights in any manner, much less ever take them away.
The People do not need the Government. The Government needs the People. The response of Congress to my family’s plight will inform the People as to whether to keep the Government that is in place or to abolish it, by force of arms if necessary, and establish something lawful in its place.
My fellow citizens need to be aware of the foregoing and need to keep a close watch on what Congress does next, specifically in regard to my family’s case.