Specific Intent

The state’s unlawful criminal case against me is now with the appellate court. Early Monday morning, I filed my APPELLANT’S PRO SE RESPONSE TO THE SHOW CAUSE ORDER DATED MAY 16, 2023.

RESPONSE TO OTSC

Treason and genocide are specific intent crimes, and the state, by is course of conduct in this matter, has proven that it is committing treason with the specific intent to betray the United States, levying war against the people, and lending aid and comfort to her enemies. The state is committing genocide with the specific intent of destroying my family and me.

I have given the court enough to move lawfully for me; it remains to be seen whether the court will do so.

War and Public Health

Public health is my profession, and I was pleased to serve in public health practice and academic public health at the local, state, national, and international levels from 1987 to 2001 as I was building my career and completing my doctorate in public health.

I am a victim of and witness to treason, genocide, war, and more carried out by an invading and occupying enemy working throughout the United States governing bodies, top to bottom, across the board, federal, state, local, but I am also an expert witness, understanding how war is very much a public health issue. In fact, I have written of that to the U.S. Surgeon General. Continue reading “War and Public Health”

Correcting the Lies!

In exposing treason, genocide, war, and more being committed against my family and me, against the United States, we continue to track down lies, which are a weapon in said warfare, and to direct those who have had a part in those lies, to whatever extent, to correct themselves and others. That was the purpose for the following August 22, 2019 letter to the Senior U.S. Probation Officer assigned to oversee my supervised release from my unlawful incarceration in federal prison, August 19, 2010 to May 29, 2019: Continue reading “Correcting the Lies!”

Righteous Demand to the Sheriff

Our cause is righteous and always has been. Some war against us by choosing to believe a lie, including lies about us. In doing so, they have leagued themselves with the enemy and are without excuse.

In treason there are no accessories; all who engage in the rebellion at any stage of its existence, or who designedly give to it any species of aid and comfort, in whatever part of the country they may be, stand on the same platform; they are all principals in the commission of the crime; they are all levying war against the United States.” [United States v. Greathouse et al., 26 F. Cas. 18, Case No. 15,254 (October 17, 1863): “FIELD, Circuit Justice (charging jury).]

That is what the law says.

In the face of the warring against us, including by those who choose to believe a lie about us and to act on that rather than the truth, we keep on doing what we do, exposing treason wherever we find it. That was the basis for the email sent to the sheriff yesterday.

Continue reading “Righteous Demand to the Sheriff”

Constitutional Proof of Treason

The Constitution of the United States includes, in Article III, Section 3, on treason:

No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Constitutional proof of treason, consistent with the aforesaid, exists in the following document:

MOTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW

That copy is from the website of the Pasco Clerk & Comptroller (Online Court Records Search) where it is entered under the title MEMORANDUM AND MOTIONS.

In the Hands of the Grand Jury

Recently, Josiah received a letter from the Office of Information Policy (OIP) denying his FOIA request for records. The OIP is the top administrative authority governing release of records. In the letter, OIP cited a 6c exemption based on the records requested being grand jury material.

Josiah’s attention was drawn to that part of the letter after seeing news reports about the same one being applied to the Mueller Report.

In looking for information for this brief blog post, I stumbled across an online publication: LAWFARE (https://www.lawfareblog.com/) a title that made me think of warfare waged in courtrooms through countering law with law. When I returned to the site, I noticed the byline, “Hard National Security Choices,” which evoked a different view. Continue reading “In the Hands of the Grand Jury”

Big News

My son Josiah Robert Fornof has been unlawfully incarcerated in federal custody continuously since August 19, 2010 and is due to be released on May 29, 2019. For all but the first year or so of that time, Josiah has been unlawfully held in federal prisons in other states. I have not seen him since his trial in August 2011. Even when he was in a federal prison an hour away from home, he would not allow us, his family, to come and visit him.

“You don’t go to a concentration camp to visit somebody,” Josiah said, “You go to get them out.” He has maintained that posture throughout.

This morning I was reminded of a telephone conversation that Josiah and I had on or about July 9, 2017. He had been talking about the relevance of President Trump’s firing of James Comey, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which occurred on May 9, 2017. Transitioning from that topic to another, Josiah said:

So, that’s big news too. Now, here’s another thing. There was a, they did a big, massive shakedown yesterday with one of the region and the warden and other higher officials here. They went to every cell… They went to every single cell except for mine. They walked around that. And then later the officer had the captain sign a paper that I could see had a seal in the upper left-hand corner with blue, from the distance I was at, it could have very possibly been, what it reminds me of, what I thought of at the time was possibly an injunction letter, for them to stay away from it, because of the evidence of treason that might be in there, and they wanted to keep them from…

The call cut off there, apparently because the 15-minute limit on the call had run out. Continue reading “Big News”